• @candybrie
    link
    12 months ago

    This is one of the reasons multi-member, proportional districts make sense. Unfortunately, I think that would take a constitutional amendment for the house of representatives.

    • @aidanM
      link
      12 months ago

      Actually, seeing you’re talking about the House elections, yeah I agree that would probably make sense, though it could over-double the size of the House. (And I don’t know that I agree that’s a good thing)

    • @aidanM
      link
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is one of the reasons multi-member, proportional districts make sense.

      Yeah I agree. The issue I have with that is just I don’t think it would be very practical, especially for smaller states. The Kentucky legislature now only has 138 members, and as far as I know nobody knows any of them.

      • @candybrie
        link
        12 months ago

        The main drawback of the scheme is that you’re usually voting for a party rather than a person. So, not knowing who any of the people actually fits in pretty well into it.

        • @aidanM
          link
          12 months ago

          The main drawback of the scheme is that you’re usually voting for a party rather than a person.

          Eh, if you had like a “top 3” system then you would be voting for a person. But I agree- voting solely being voting for a party is something I oppose(and why I prefer the US system to parliamentary systems)