• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    ML would be about a vanguard party. That kind of elected council with central planning can happen without it. That vanguard party is where ML goes all wrong and tends to devolve into cult-like behavior. Edit: and not just the big one’s in Russia/China/N. Korea. Lots of smaller ML groups devolve into cult-like behavior, too.

    I do agree, though, that the second panel is still too specific. There are many ways to organize the workers, and that second panel is far too narrow.

    It is very clear that it’s about Socialism, so leaving AnComms out is fair.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      AnComms are socialists, though. As are communists, and all anarchists who are not AnCaps, but those aren’t even really anarchists.

      Socialism is just about workers controlling the means of production; how you get there, the styles and forms of leadership, and all other things, are where all subgroups differ. The same way that in capitalism you can have Soc-Dems, Liberals, Libertarian Capitalists, Fascists, etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        AnComms are under the socialist umbrella, but the comic isn’t delving into every single thing that’s under that umbrella, because it’s not 600 pages long.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -32 months ago

          Right, instead is it’s delving specifically into ML and making it sound like that is specifically what socialism is; it’s not. And it sounds like you agree, so… I really don’t get what your point is. Sounds like you’re arguing for the sake of arguing.