@return2ozma to Lemmy Shitpost • 4 months agoWhy do we put up with this crap?imagemessage-square180arrow-up11.29Karrow-down142
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imageWhy do we put up with this crap?@return2ozma to Lemmy Shitpost • 4 months agomessage-square180
minus-square@Nurguslink5•4 months agoConcorde wasn’t far off that sort of speed. But it was too expensive. Such speeds will probably return in some form one day.
minus-square@rezifonlinkEnglish2•edit-24 months ago Concorde wasn’t far off that sort of speed. . . The concorde took 180 minutes (3 hours) to travel from New York to London (3,000 nautical miles). Ignoring range limits, a trip from New York to Tokyo (5,861 nautical miles) at that speed would take 351 minutes (5.8 hours).
Concorde wasn’t far off that sort of speed. But it was too expensive. Such speeds will probably return in some form one day.
The concorde took 180 minutes (3 hours) to travel from New York to London (3,000 nautical miles).
Ignoring range limits, a trip from New York to Tokyo (5,861 nautical miles) at that speed would take 351 minutes (5.8 hours).