@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agoSufferingmander.xyzimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1640arrow-down116
arrow-up1624arrow-down1imageSufferingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoI vote for fair distribution of suffering, instead of to just 100 people.
minus-square@MaaluslinkEnglish1•2 months agoWhy tho? Your choice is to condemn a few, versus kill more people than have died throughout all of history of humankind. 100 is a drop in a bucket compared to eternal genocide.
minus-squareFaridlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoIt’s a communist thing. Fair distribution of wealth and suffering.
minus-square@trolololollinkEnglish1•edit-21 month agoIt’s a capitalist assumption to think people with less karma goes first. Would you change your answer based on where you are on the tracks?
I vote for fair distribution of suffering, instead of to just 100 people.
Why tho? Your choice is to condemn a few, versus kill more people than have died throughout all of history of humankind. 100 is a drop in a bucket compared to eternal genocide.
deleted by creator
It’s a communist thing. Fair distribution of wealth and suffering.
It’s a capitalist assumption to think people with less karma goes first.
Would you change your answer based on where you are on the tracks?