• @frostysauce
    link
    English
    -31 month ago

    Yes. Decry the fact she has a platform. By commenting on a post about her… Thus amplifying her reach and her platform.

    Or perhaps join the rest of us and call out her shitty views any time she is mentioned helping to ensure her platform is at least also used to amplify dissenting views.

    Or just not comment if all you’re trying to do is be super edgy or whatever.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 month ago

      It feels like people make loving or hating this literally a core part of their personality, and is a good model of the enshittification of the internet. The more one side pushes, the further the other side pushes back. A new species has emerged from the mingling of internet trolls and keyboard warriors. I’m going to call it the internet troglodyte. Constantly inflamatory and escalating conflict, the trog does not troll for the lulz, but they have such strong opinions they must share them everywhere every chance they have, often harming the cause they purport while turning online spaces into echo chambers.

    • @Cryophilia
      link
      English
      101 month ago

      Or just not comment if all you’re trying to do is be super edgy or whatever.

      Telling lemmy not to be super edgy is a losing battle, friend.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Maybe I wasn’t clear, I don’t think calling out Rowling’s shitty views is part of the problem. What I was trying to point at was that fandoms are just a means of marketing and people are too uncritical about how capitalism interferes with art. People are getting steered towards “investing” time and attention into something that isn’t really worth it, and the author, unable to follow up the success because she really isn’t that talented, instead clamps on the attention by putting out edgy political statements.