• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    123 months ago

    It’s not really a mandate so there’s no revolt. As per The Friendly Atheist blog and podcast, this superintendent dumbfuck has no authority to enforce what he said. School officials may be saying fuck that, but it’s not a revolt when he made a completely empty statement.

    The first to push back happened last month. The superintendent’s office, when asked by press, replied: “Oh yes they will.” With no language about how they would make that happen.

    Fuck this christofascist, but this story / headline is bullshit. (I didn’t read the story because I already know that the headline doesn’t match reality thanks to TFA.)

    https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/oklahoma-superintendent-rejects-bibles

    https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/more-oklahoma-school-districts-are

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      30
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It is a revolt for districts have to reject guidance from a superintendent en masse. That’s not a normal way for an education system to be run. So it’s not bullshit; you just are a bit too strict with your semantics, but that’s your issue.

      • @SirSamuel
        link
        73 months ago

        What!? There are no pedants on the Internet! How dare you

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -83 months ago

        A guy with no authority to mandate teaching the bible mandated teaching the bible. Everyone said haha. That’s not a revolt.