• @Bernie_Sandals
      link
      214 months ago

      You understand that Castro went after than more than just slave owners right? It’s super disingenuous to pretend that most of the 1.5 million people who have fled Cuba were slave owners.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        30
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        If they were fine with Batista being a military dictator, but drew the line at someone trying to upend his stint as one, I’m going to ask, why the military dictatorship didn’t cause them to flee every time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        134 months ago

        You understand people fled Cuba not only because Castro was trying to take their plantation or Casino, but because the US has spent over have a century carrying out terrorist attacks and engineered a famine right?

        • BlackLaZoR
          link
          fedilink
          -114 months ago

          carrying out terrorist attacks and engineered a famine right?

          Citation needed

          BTW: You mean that time when Cuba was soviet ally and had on their territory soviet nukes aimed at US?

          Fuck you and your revisionism.

      • BlackLaZoR
        link
        fedilink
        -104 months ago

        They’re cultists. If you talk to them in neutral sub, You’ll find horribly defective logic and broken definitions (“Your definition of Anarchy is wRoNg, anarchy is an organised system!!!”).

        If you try talking to them in one of their sub, you’ll get banned instantly. Socialists/communists are pro censorship and therefore pro coercion. No wonder, every communist state turned into dictatorship.

        • @Bernie_Sandals
          link
          104 months ago

          I agree with most of what you’ve said, you should read more from anarchist philosophers like Tolstoy or Goldman though.

          Socialists

          However I would subtract the socialist from you comment and just keep it at communist, there’s plenty of democratic socialist parties that never devolved into rampant totalitarianism like the leninist parties did.

          • BlackLaZoR
            link
            fedilink
            -134 months ago

            plenty of democratic socialist parties that never devolved into rampant totalitarianism like the leninist parties did

            I guess you’re right there, still, they tend to be authoritarian - socialism in the soviet controlled republics was rather ugly - centrally planned economy, rationing of everything from meat and sugar to cars and housing, censorship of any political subject in media, ever present corruption, berlin wall to keep people from escaping…

            Not a place you’d want to live in.

            • @Bernie_Sandals
              link
              104 months ago

              Not a place you’d want to live in.

              Of course not, which is why it’s unfair to lump in welfare state creators like the demsoc parties of western Europe, and the brutal leninist parties of Asia and Eastern Europe.

              • BlackLaZoR
                link
                fedilink
                -34 months ago

                the demsoc parties of western Europe

                They often have socialism in their name, but I don’t really consider them socialist, as you said - they’re welfare state supporters, which is really, really far away from socialism in soviet controlled eastern europe

                • @Bernie_Sandals
                  link
                  10
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  which is really, really far away from socialism in soviet controlled eastern europe

                  In that it’s democratic and they want to expand rights from just being political to also being economic? Yes I agree, they’re severely different from the Soviet style parties, but that doesn’t make them not socialist, their left wing members will usually still argue for the ownership of the means of production by workers, usually they just argue for cooperatives rather than mass nationalization nowadays.

                • Cethin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  54 months ago

                  No, of course. Only the bad things are socialist! The good ones clearly are not true socialist! /s

                  You’re pretty fucking stupid my man. Leftism is as broad as anything else, and socialism can take a wide variety of forms and positions. Authoritarianism is the thing that causes issues, and that can be anywhere on the left, right, and center. In the traditional political compass (which isn’t worth much, but whatever) there’s left/right as liberal/conservative, but there’s also up/down as authority/liberty.

                  • BlackLaZoR
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -24 months ago

                    No, of course. Only the bad things are socialist!

                    Well it happens it’s a shitty system.

                    You’re pretty fucking stupid my man

                    That’s pretty rich coming from a person who probably cant even define socialism, not to mention applying that definition in real life

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          If you try talking to them in one of their sub, you’ll get banned instantly. Socialists/communists are pro censorship and therefore pro coercion. No wonder, every communist state turned into dictatorship.

          are we talking about hexbear? The sub that is insufferably boring?