IOC President Thomas Bach said the “hate speech” directed at boxers Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting at the Paris Olympics is “totally unacceptable.”

“We will not take part in a politically motivated … cultural war,” Bach said at a news briefing Saturday at the midway point of the Paris Games, where he wanted to draw a line under days of global scrutiny about the female boxers’ gender.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    21 month ago

    You absolutely are being dishonest. It is not a personal attack. You told me to look at appendix 6. Why did you tell me to look at that if you weren’t being dishonest?

    Did you mean appendix 7? Appendix 5? Which appendix was I supposed to look at?

    I just presume that if the participants agree to the testing

    What if she agreed to the testing because she was told if she didn’t, they would use their clout to make sure that she never boxed anyone again? What if she agreed to pull out of the appeal for the same reason? That would be in no way unprecedented in sports to threaten an athlete like that.

    You don’t know how she was tested. You don’t know why she stopped the appeal. All you know is that she was tested for something and she decided it was worth appealing at some point, but ended that appeal for unknown reasons. And the thing she was tested for was not testosterone.

    And based on all of that, you have decided that she is a man.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Again, you’re calling me dishonest when I have done nothing but provide the information and guided you to key points within it to make your own due diligence easier. A lack of which is becoming more and more obvious the more you ad hominem instead of reading. Testosterone is not the only thing checked in the doping guidelines if you follow the chain of references.

      And based on all of that, you have decided that she is a man.

      I also have clearly not decided she is a man, hence my use of ‘she’ as pronoun many times in the past comments. Please improve your reading comprehension and critical thinking skills as your hostility is patently unfounded when all I’ve argued is that both of them did not full heartedly appeal which strongly suggests the disqualification is on solid grounds they agreed to beforehand.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        11 month ago

        I also have clearly not decided she is a man

        Cool. So she can compete with other women whatever the test says. We’re in agreement.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            21 month ago

            I appreciate it. However, in this case, based on their history, they look like just a new user to lemmy.world. They may have a different account for .ml though.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            11 month ago

            How would she not be competing fairly if she’s a woman?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              They were tested and found to violate the rules they agreed to which in my book means to compete unfairly.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                0
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Which rules did they violate? How do you know the test was fair?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  The rules stipulated in the contract. It was fair because they both agreed to them like everyone else does.