• The Pantser
    link
    English
    -473 months ago

    So give them more reasons to use AI. A strike against someone taking your job seems like a hard battle.

    • @Wilzax
      link
      English
      503 months ago

      Let them try to make games with only AI and see how they sell. This strike is to force producers to go “all or nothing” with AI, and choosing “all” is a terrible idea

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        173 months ago

        AI being heavily implemented in voice acting is gonna suck so bad. Maybe in a few years it will be there but we’re too early for full scale voice talent being replaced. Wish these people all the best with the strike.

        • @Wilzax
          link
          English
          103 months ago

          Replacing people with AI creates a situation where the incentive for people to make original works is greatly diminished, so the ability of the AI to continue to improve is stunted by a lack of new training data. It’s what we’re already seeing with text-based language models and what we’re starting to see with diffusion-based image models.

          AI in art is inherently limited unless used only as a fine tuner on human made works. The fact that a work of art was made by humans is what makes it special in the first place.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            Hard agree. There’s still a threat of the generalised nature of AI meaning it won’t just be a tool for people to use, but a complete replacement of large swathes of knowledge based work that can be automated.

          • @Jarix
            link
            English
            13 months ago

            But that scenario does have a flipside, possibly even a silver lining if it was macximized. Makes games a hell of a lot easier for indie devs to close the gap on aspects of production that right now. Decreasing a significant portion of cost/budget that will be to indie devs advantage.

            Which if luck holds, would really hurt the triple A dogshit studios and create a lot more competition that they have consolidated with the big mergers and acquisitions that have happened in recent years.

            Im all for empowering the little guys.

            (For clarity i dont want devs to replace any humans with AI)

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            Replacing people with AI creates a situation where the incentive for people to make original works is greatly diminished,

            Why would that be? It should be tye opposite, making VO cheaper means studios can take risks and get experimental. Basically what cheap engines have done for indie development.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -63 months ago

      I think a second, larger issue is that they decided to strike right when the industry is laying people off at large scale. That’s not very good timing to try a pressure play.

      • Luke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        I disagree, that’s an ideal time to exert labor leverage and make it more obvious to executive turds that workers have solidarity with each other.