• Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      English
      854 months ago

      I mean, it wasn’t a horrible theory at the time, and there was even some evidence for it (because the blacksmiths sons were very likely also blacksmiths, and thus also muscular). Even Darwin couldn’t explain HOW his theory evolution was actually supposed to function, he basically just said that it did.

      Unfortunately, even after we discovered genes, people were still following Lamarck, and it’s offshoot, Lysonkoism got a LOT of people killed, despite by then being verifiably false.

      • @idiomaddict
        link
        English
        784 months ago

        There’s also epigenetics, which could be described as a very limited version of Lamarckism that actually holds water. That’s stretching definitions, but it does involve lifestyle conditions in one generation that affect future generations. So far, it’s mostly restricted to things like famine in one generation leading to increased fat storage in future generations, iirc.

        • Zloubida
          link
          English
          14 months ago

          So could have been Darwinism before the discovery of the genes.

    • Jolteon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      I mean, that’s basically halfway to pokémon evolution already. I’m in.