• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    There’s a massive gap between “you can’t make a tool” and “you can’t identify it”.

    The problem with a tool is the exact same as the issue with LLMs to begin with. It does not resemble intelligence or comprehension in any way and cannot use it as an indicator.

    But the use of LLMs is absolutely identifiable to moderately intelligent humans, because LLM output has raw language skills wildly inconsistent with every other skill that is part of writing.

    • Dr. Moose
      link
      English
      04 months ago

      What’s even point of your argument? That a detective can figure out who used AI? Yes detectives can figure out most stuff. This is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand my dude.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What are you talking about “detectives”?

        You said “nobody can identify LLM use” when any moderately intelligent human can identify LLM output pretty easily. It explodes off the page.

        • Dr. Moose
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Whatever dude not playing these stupid games. You know exactly what I meant. Go away 👋

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            It’s not a game.

            Spreading the lie that LLMs are somehow indistinguishable from humans is incredibly harmful. It’s a big part of the reason the obscene waste of energy the entire “force chatbots into everything” space exists.