• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2563 months ago

    Such a business genius to just completely trash well known name branding that most companies would kill to have. Twitter was a household name, the bird instantly recognizable with the brand, and “tweet” and “retweet” as common words.

    Such a brilliant display of Vision™ by Musk.

    • @hushable
      link
      843 months ago

      not only that, heaps of cultures associate birds with rumours and news (a little bird told me that …). I was genius marketing and top tier branding

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        153 months ago

        And here we are, more than a year later, and any time anyone actually calls it by its new name, it’s always followed by (previously Twitter). Hilarious. Because the new name is fucking nonsense

    • @pyre
      link
      49
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      and also it had the bonus that being commonly used in language still posed no risk of genericizing the trademark.

      people say kleenex to mean tissue, xerox to mean photocopy (xerox famously put out ads telling people not to use their trademark name in generic context)…

      … but never twitter to mean any social network or even microblogging. or tweet to mean a post on facebook or even mastodon. tweet is almost always used to mean a post on twitter specifically.

      so it was not only universally recognized and thoroughly integrated in language, but also specific enough to be safe for the trademark. an absolute dream for any brand.

      and what did the genius do? throw it away for a single letter that’s used to mean unknown or generic (great brand strategy btw), but only when it’s not used to mean porn.

      seriously, since I’m a graphic designer and interested in these things i’ve seen some bad rebrandings before but this has to be the absolute worst.

        • @pyre
          link
          73 months ago

          what? how?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            183 months ago

            It was the single platform where scientists and the politically active could interact, safe from regressives via twitters moderation policy. Essentially, a place where verified experts could share opinions to a receptive audience.

            By taking over, the verifiablitiy went, the voices of the uninformed were weighted the same as the informed, and whatever (mostly left-leaning) communities existed there became fragmented as the twitter experience went down as the UX became more hostile and ad-ridden.

            The progressives are recovering, and finding their communities again, but mostly via bluesky/mastodon

            • @pyre
              link
              23
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              you give him way too much credit. he’s a fucking moron and he didn’t even buy twitter on purpose. he thought could back out of it just like he backs out of everything he says but was forced to go through with one of the worst purchases in history.

              also the rebranding is not to ruin twitter but to pivot to the everything app he’s been trying to make for a long time. the name X is also something he always liked because he’s a child. he tried to name PayPal X too, and also named one of his children X. none of what he does is 5d chess. he’s just a loser idiot who has been failing up for too long.

              • @reka
                link
                133 months ago

                Collectively we keep forgetting this and it’s so important. This isn’t 5D fascist chess, this is a guy who got so high on approval from the masses on Twitter he lost his fucking mind. Everything he does these days is for approval from people. The crowd he has decided are the cool kids, who laugh at his shit jokes, are fascists. I don’t even think he’s a fascist, I think he’s an irresponsible egotist with no stable sense of self-worth who deep down knows he’s a fraud.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                33 months ago

                he’s not some idiot being propped up by rich backers for the purpose of political disunity: he is that rich backer that props up others.

                Do not mistake public theater for incompetence.

                • @pyre
                  link
                  4
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  he has demonstrated incompetence so many fucking times it’s incredible that you are even saying this. he is most definitely an idiot.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    13 months ago

                    I’m just saying, true idiots rarely remain rich. Chances are he knows exactly what he’s doing by openly talking about his horrific beliefs and empowering those who share the same values as him.

              • @Goodmorningsunshine
                link
                13 months ago

                I mean, the ends are the same whether he was an independent actor or a puppet. Now Saudi Arabian is the second-largest owner of Twitter and it is destroyed as the mechanism it once was for progressive protest against governments.

              • @Fedizen
                link
                13 months ago

                Elon may be a moron but Saudi Arabia pitched in with direct goals. Imo the fact that any company can be partially owned by a dictatorship and receive constitutional protections is a tentacle of the Citizens United ruling.