• Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not according to the etymology. https://www.etymonline.com/word/*removed*

      1786, earlier neger (1568, Scottish and northern England dialect), negar, negur, from French nègre, from Spanish negro (see Negro).

      All of these languages are latin-based languages… So there must be a latin root. If you dig further you find

      from Latin nigrum (nominative niger) “black, dark, sable, dusky” (applied to the night sky, a storm, the complexion), figuratively “gloomy, unlucky, bad, wicked,”

      So yes negro exists in the middle but not as the source necessarily… It would have evolved (if I read the etymology correctly) as Nigrum -> Niger -> Negro/neger/negar/negur -> removed.

      • @madcaesar
        link
        63 months ago

        Good thing the N word is being censored here, otherwise we might actually learn something.

        I fucking hate indiscriminate censorship. In some context the word is important in order to learn and educate

          • @madcaesar
            link
            63 months ago

            Oh that’s good to know and also fucked up, I thought they stopped that censoring bullshit. Thank you for letting me know.

          • @yamanii
            link
            13 months ago

            How would I go about to see this post outsife ot my .world? I can’t even click the link because it removes it from the URL, this is so fucking stupid.

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Yeah… While admittedly discussions like this one are far outweighed by the negative uses of the term; when discussion is happening where clarity is more relevant than appeasing the euphemism treadmill censorship sucks.

          https://lemmy.saik0.com/comment/3423797 should get you to the original version. My instance doesn’t censor.