• @RememberTheApollo_
    link
    English
    244 months ago

    Maybe they’re coming out with something new and more expensive, or they’ve entered a licensing deal with another -cast-able company so they can charge you or get licensing fees without the manufacturing overhead.

    Or maybe they’re just being Google and cancelling yet another thing that people like to use.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        English
        44 months ago

        1 and a little of 2. New device and a new way to charge you.

    • @Stovetop
      link
      English
      64 months ago

      They are, I saw an article for it the other day. Some compact set top box running Android TV that costs way more than any Chromecast ever did.

      Casting is nice but I’m thinking now is a good time to consider switching to something like Apple TV if you need a dedicated streaming device since there’s basically no price difference anymore.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        I’ve had good luck with Roku so far, I know they’re questionable but short of building a system to handle casting/streaming for me they seem to be the best bet right now