• @NineMileTower
      link
      361 month ago

      Yeah, but he had a DUI once and I DO NOT VOTE FOR CRIMINALS. So, I have to vote for Trump.

    • @ChocoboRocket
      link
      341 month ago

      Even if he had suspicions, he’d been in service for 24 years, which is huge.

      If I worked for someone for 24 years and they looked like they wanted to go fight overseas, I’d absolutely consider retirement as well.

      Service to your country isn’t accomplished exclusively by going overseas to shoot people.

      Republicans are literally speed running a 100% completed anti-christ identity. Not even in the specific ‘end of days antichrist’, but like literally, specifically, the complete opposite of absolutely everything their Christian deity Jesus stood for.

    • TipRing
      link
      English
      171 month ago

      The deployment was announced months after he put in for retirement.

        • finley
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 month ago

          Yes. The Minnesota National Guard is the source of this information.

            • finley
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Funny, because with a fraction of typing and effort that you put into the previous two of your comments, you could’ve just googled that, and you would’ve gotten your answer.

              That being the case, you obviously aren’t interested in knowing the answer to that question, you’re just here to troll.

        • TipRing
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          It’s fair to ask.

          https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tim-walz-military-record/

          He filed his campaign paperwork in February 2005, which would have necessitated his retirement. In March the MN Guard announced a partial deployment but his unit wasn’t specifically told they were deploying, he retired in May, his unit received orders to deploy in July.