Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), one of the world’s largest advanced computer chip manufacturers, continues finding its efforts to get its Arizona facility up and running to be more difficult than it anticipated. The chip maker’s 5nm wafer fab was supposed to go online in 2024 but has faced numerous setbacks and now isn’t expected to begin production until 2025. The trouble the semiconductor has been facing boils down to a key difference between Taiwan and the U.S.: workplace culture. A New York Times report highlights the continuing struggle.

One big problem is that TSMC has been trying to do things the Taiwanese way, even in the U.S. In Taiwan, TSMC is known for extremely rigorous working conditions, including 12-hour work days that extend into the weekends and calling employees into work in the middle of the night for emergencies. TSMC managers in Taiwan are also known to use harsh treatment and threaten workers with being fired for relatively minor failures.

TSMC quickly learned that such practices won’t work in the U.S. Recent reports indicated that the company’s labor force in Arizona is leaving the new plant over these perceived abuses, and TSMC is struggling to fill those vacancies. TSMC is already heavily dependent on employees brought over from Taiwan, with almost half of its current 2,200 employees in Phoenix coming over as Taiwanese transplants.

  • @NeoNachtwaechter
    link
    English
    1361 month ago

    extremely rigorous working conditions, including 12-hour work days that extend into the weekends and calling employees into work in the middle of the night for emergencies. TSMC managers in Taiwan are also known to use harsh treatment and threaten workers with being fired for relatively minor failures.

    Funny. The same issues that Tesla is experiencing in Germany.

    • RubberDuck
      link
      English
      951 month ago

      Yeah… I personally was surprised there are developed nations with a more toxic corpo culture than the US. But apparently the Asian powerhouses are all built on corporate servitude.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        661 month ago

        For a lot of Asian countries the “asian dream” is still somewhat realistic.

        Just look at China or Korea. Many of the older folks there grew up in abject poverty, but the countries managed to develop themselves through hard labor into modern, wealthy nations. The promise of “my kids will have it better” was actually true for them. And that promise still drives a lot of the work culture. In China the first cracks already appear, since for the first time in 50 years or so, the current youth has no way up anymore.

        • RubberDuck
          link
          English
          251 month ago

          Yeah… korea, Japan, Taiwan, China

        • tiredofsametab
          link
          fedilink
          51 month ago

          Japan is slowly getting better, but it’s a long road ahead. There are more laws and they’re actually enforcing some of them with regard to harassment and hours worked (a lot of people would clock out and keep working, but they’re trying to make the penalties bit enough to stop it from what I hear. My company is certainly strict about it).

          It’d be nice to have european-level vacations before I retire, but that I don’t see happening

      • @aidan
        link
        English
        01 month ago

        Central/Eastern Europe somewhat does.

        Also, I don’t like how in much of Europe for many jobs you can’t quit at will, you legally have to give notice (and sometimes not a short one).

        • RubberDuck
          link
          English
          101 month ago

          At will employment is horse shit. A notice period on a month or 2 months is fine… you agree up front so you know. And your next employer counts this in when hiring. And mostly you have some vacation days you can take to shorten it a bit.

          In the Netherlands a determined contract of a year has no “out” other than an agreement between the 2 parties… otherwise you serve it in full. Which is what you agree to when starting it.

          • @aidan
            link
            English
            -41 month ago

            Agreeing to it doesn’t mean I like it…

            Trapping people in terrible jobs sucks. Especially when it’s considered the legal standard and your contract has to state it’s at will(which might be illegal in some places)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              It means they can’t just fire you either. Unless they pay the entire severance up front, which can be multiple months of wage.

              Also, losing your job has a lot more impact on your life than a company losing one of its workers impacts that business. So it is definitely in the employees favour.

              • @aidan
                link
                English
                -21 month ago

                It depends on the job. And you’re not always guaranteed severance.

                It’s a lot more impactful for the worker if they’re trapped in a terrible situation making them miserable. Or if they have to go somewhere else

                • RubberDuck
                  link
                  English
                  31 month ago

                  You read like someone that got a rough deal, ended up in a shit company with a fixed term contract and now regrets signing it.

                  Most contracts have a probation period… where it is effectively at will. After that, you are stuck for the duration, which is what was agreed.

                  I don’t know what makes the company so miserable, but not going above and beyond, coming in on time and leaving on time usually helps a lot. I’m not saying start slacking off… but not meeting overbearing production quotas… What are they going to do… fire you? Or pull you off the floor for conversations…

                  • @aidan
                    link
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    It was a job that required traveling, was trying to refuse paying overtime for travel time. Because I was constantly traveling I couldn’t see my friends, family, or partner. Was unpredictable mandatory overtime.

                    But I already quit months ago.

                    And yes, I’m sure some of that was illegal on their part. But there wasn’t much I could do.

            • RubberDuck
              link
              English
              11
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Such a weird take.

              A month is easily survivable, the snowball of Beiing fired on the spot, having no income, not being able to afford your living expenses, debts, homelessness is not.

              At will employment might be good for a view niche jobs, for most jobs especially the lower paid, it just gives the employer even more power over their employees.

              I’d suggest you take your weird american viewpoint on employment and go away. We like the fact that employees get proper protections against predatory corpos.

              • @aidan
                link
                English
                -41 month ago

                A month is easily survivable

                Depends on the job/employer.

                Furthermore it’s more important when things come up. Say you need to go take care of a relative in an emergency.

                • RubberDuck
                  link
                  English
                  101 month ago

                  Yeah, let’s make all regulations up based on exceptions and edgecases.

                  If something happens and you need space, most EU countries have leave for that, you can also take vacation days (we also get those by law)… or your employer allows you to go.

                  Again, strange corpo way of trying to normalize not having proper contracts and labor protections. You have bought in to the propaganda too much.

                  Probably anti union too, no?

                  • @aidan
                    link
                    English
                    -31 month ago

                    Yeah, let’s make all regulations up based on exceptions and edgecases.

                    When it comes to people’s freedoms, yes.

                    If something happens and you need space, most EU countries have leave for that

                    Assuming you’ve earned/haven’t used it.

                    Again, strange corpo way of trying to normalize not having proper contracts and labor protections. You have bought in to the propaganda too much.

                    Not a corpo. Stop with the ad hominems.

                    Probably anti union too, no?

                    Some unions do good things, some do bad.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 month ago

          It goes both ways, your employer can’t fire you at will either. But it goes further, usually you have a probation period, in Germany it’s up to 6 months during which you can leave any time, or be fired at any time. Beyond that there’s always the option to agree on a shorter notice period, but if you’re getting fired and you agree to a shorter period you won’t get unemployment compensation for that time.