Weight limits for bicycles need to be higher and more transparent, especially if the majority of people want to use them.

  • mommykink
    link
    English
    -91 month ago

    You are an idiot.

      • mommykink
        link
        English
        71 month ago

        I implore you to go to Italy circa 1970s and tell Design Group Italia that 140kgs is an unacceptably low weight limit for a single-person stool. Quit normalizing suicide via obesity.

        • @ieatpwns
          link
          English
          -11 month ago

          I’m not normalizing obesity I’m criticizing the design of a stool. I looked up the stool you mentioned and it looked like it connected the seat to the legs just by being fastened together from center of the seat to a small point where the legs joined together in a sort of pyramid like design. If the stool had been designed with each of the legs equidistant closer to the circumference of the seat it probably wouldn’t have taken as much damage from Bigman. But idk I’m not a stool designer or a Time Machine owner

          • Zoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 month ago

            Youre a person who prefers function over aesthetics, thats totally fine.

            140kg stool is perfectly acceptable as a furniture piece anywhere but your mind.

            • @Samuel_Sturm
              link
              English
              -11 month ago

              Well, no. There’s a place for design and fashion pieces and a place for lightweight / inexpensive pieces. But the middle of the road options, your everyday average furniture? Those should be sturdy, reliable, simple pieces. I can see a stool having a 140kg weight limit when looking at it from the perspective of “a stool is for one person sitting on it”.

              But I’d rather it have a bit more strength. Things happen, like somebody wanting to sit in your lap for a moment or children being silly. Design for when things go wrong, not for a happy path use case.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      If it’s not meant to hold 300lbs, it’s a decoration, not a stool! My apartment is only built for 2 relatively fit people, being a small walkup. So I consider it more a sculpture than something functional.

      • mommykink
        link
        English
        131 month ago

        Have we really normalized obesity to such an extent that we consider “a small walk” to be an indication of being fit? God.

        On the other point, maybe some Europeans can chime in: would you consider a stool unusable and fit only for decoration if its weight limit was 140 kilos?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          140kg limit for anything you’re putting all your weight on is quite generous.

          Anything over like 100kg limit is bonus

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          A walkup apartment means no elevator, so to be fair to anyone else, a small walkup could still require like 15 flights of stairs. And by “small” I was referring to the apartment, but obviously still joking about the whole comment. Saying that a small apartment is only for fit people is supposed to be like saying a stool with a 300lb limit isn’t a stool.

    • FartsWithAnAccentM
      link
      English
      -1
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

      Don’t be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

      Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

      Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.