• Jerkface (any/all)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Yes, well, you can not be an anarchist while supporting the exploitation of animals, either, but look around you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      64 months ago

      Fuck yea, animal liberation all the way. Not sure why you’re using that to defend capitalism tho. Doesn’t really feel like a good faith comment to make.

      • Jerkface (any/all)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        What I am saying is that you are going to have to search pretty fucking hard for a “real” anarchist once you start applying the actual definition.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          You’re right that there is a definition of anarchism that nobody will meet, just like there’s a definition of feminism or capitalism or communism that nobody will meet. Those definitions are therefore useless, but that doesn’t mean anything goes.

          There’s a difference between self-styled ‘anarchists’ who name themselves after oppressive systems and consciously include oppressive tools in their proposals for change and self-styled ‘anarchists’ who name themselves after systems that can help empower anarchism and that try to include as little archism in their proposals for change as possible.

          The anarchist movement isn’t a static definition, it’s a vector force pulling at present-day society. Ancaps don’t pull along that vector. Non-vegan anarchocommunists do.

    • Victoria Antoinette
      link
      24 months ago

      yes, you can. basically every anarchist who has ever lived has been ok with animal exploitation.