cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18475086

I’m not against those who work for sex, but the idea to earn for a living doesn’t seem nice. IMO, sex should be for 2 people (or more for others who prefer polyamory) who wants to be intimate/romantic with each other. My point is money should not be the purpose.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    511 month ago

    selling your body

    i hate that phrasing to describe sex work. no one is “selling their body”, as they are still in control of it. sex workers provide a service, same as a masseuse or hair stylist (except their service involves genitals) and it should be treated as such.

    Otherwise one could argue that all (physical) labour is “selling your body”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      361 month ago

      It seems to me like joining the military is arguably more deserving of the phrase “selling your body”; you’re basically signing up to get injured or killed.

    • Funkytom467
      link
      61 month ago

      I think the “body” in that expression is quite specifically referring to genitals, or the selling of your intimacy.

      Because that’s what’s different from any other physical labour, the part of your body involved. That’s the specific problem of sex work no?

    • @Ptsf
      link
      51 month ago

      It is a high risk job along the lines of coal mining and such, since it will result in an increase in transmitted disease risk. It’s important to acknowledge that, but I am on the side of it being work. I just think we need strong protections in place and regulations to handle it akin to other dangerous jobs. Like, a sex work branch of OSHA.

    • Lem Jukes
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      It’s not even an argument really, it’s the undeniable logical conclusion that trading your labor and/or time for compensation is work, period.