• Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
    link
    -283 months ago

    Oh, ok, cool. Then the Democratic and Republican parties have nothing to fear from her.

    So they should be fine with debating her and having her on the ballot. I mean, hey she’s “completely irrelevant,” right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      Being completely irrelevant, there’s no reason to waste time debating her, but if she meets the criteria for either I don’t think anybody cares.

      • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
        link
        -223 months ago

        Being completely irrelevant, there’s no reason to waste time debating her, but if she meets the criteria for either I don’t think anybody cares.

        So what is threshold do you think she, or ANY 3rd party candidate, needs to meet to be considered worthy of a debate? Serious question. Because her party is the 4th biggest political party in the US. Behind Libertarians.

          • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
            link
            -223 months ago

            third parties are irrelevant.

            Then you have nothing to fear, nor do you have anything to be annoyed about, when it comes to the existence of 3rd parties and the voting for 3rd parties.

              • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
                link
                -193 months ago

                Yet, you do seem to care enough to have a conversation about it, and interact in this community thread about it. So I guess you care a little bit.

                  • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
                    link
                    -19
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Making fun of you is something I do care about.

                    Reported for breaking civility rule of this community. If you disagree with me, that’s fine. But bragging about making fun of me is not. Be civil or please refrain from posting.