• aard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    183 months ago

    Paid and FOSS are not mutually exclusive. You can always build packages yourself if you don’t want to pay. A well executed implementation might allow some projects to drop or reduce their play store efforts.

    • @PopOfAfrica
      link
      English
      43 months ago

      I will download APKs off a website before I use anything with ads.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Paid and FOSS are mutually exclusive. Open source and FOSS aren’t.

      But how, you ask? Free means having the right to do whatever you want with your copy including make copies and redistribute. Thus, how can it be free while demanding a payment before allowing usage?

      That’s why I said, FOSS Droid? Nah! Open Source Droid? Knock yourself out. I’m actually looking forward to supporting some of the developers of apps I love.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        One of the things you’re free to do is pay for a copy of the binary. Therefore you haven’t shown that FOSS and paid are mutually exclusive. 😁

      • Undearius
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        And the “free” means “freedom”, it doesn’t mean “no price”

      • @rtxn
        link
        English
        11
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Free does not mean “no payment, ever”. If the source code and build toolchain are openly and completely available, but prebuilt binaries are paid-only, it still satisfies the “free as in gratis” criterion.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -23 months ago

          Unless the payment method involves proprietary software. Also online payments are service as a software substitute (SaaS)