They’re also massively outgunned, so they will lose eventually. At the expense of the rest of Gazans. Why is that an acceptable outcome to you rather than a negotiated ceasefire?
So, again, you’re saying just let all the Gazans die.
Because without a negotiated ceasefire, whether you think it will happen or not (and I would love to borrow your crystal ball), that is what will happen.
I believe they are saying that thanks to Bibi, there can’t be a cease-fire. They aren’t advocating for them to kill the hostages or hand them all over, they are saying regardless of what happens with the hostages Bibi is going to continue to indiscriminately kill Gazans. In a tongue in cheek manner it was suggested Bibi is using the hostages as an excuse for continued attacks, so if there aren’t hostages, there’s no excuse. I don’t think that was an honest suggestion, just gallows humor. But the point is valid that Bibi doesn’t actually care about the hostages and will keep genociding to his heart’s content.
I don’t think they are being tongue-in-cheek at all. From all I can see, they’re saying that there will be no negotiations, period, so Hamas needs to fight until everyone is dead.
Because, again, that is the only option I can see if there isn’t even a point in trying to negotiate. They are fighting a vastly superior force in a tiny space around a lot of innocent people.
They are fighting back.
They’re also massively outgunned, so they will lose eventually. At the expense of the rest of Gazans. Why is that an acceptable outcome to you rather than a negotiated ceasefire?
Because bibi DOESNT CARE.
There will NEVER BE A NEGOTIATED CEASEFIRE.
Bibi is fucking evil.
So, again, you’re saying just let all the Gazans die.
Because without a negotiated ceasefire, whether you think it will happen or not (and I would love to borrow your crystal ball), that is what will happen.
There will be no other outcome.
That is not acceptable.
I believe they are saying that thanks to Bibi, there can’t be a cease-fire. They aren’t advocating for them to kill the hostages or hand them all over, they are saying regardless of what happens with the hostages Bibi is going to continue to indiscriminately kill Gazans. In a tongue in cheek manner it was suggested Bibi is using the hostages as an excuse for continued attacks, so if there aren’t hostages, there’s no excuse. I don’t think that was an honest suggestion, just gallows humor. But the point is valid that Bibi doesn’t actually care about the hostages and will keep genociding to his heart’s content.
Thank you for your reading comprehension skills.
That’s exactly what I was getting at.
Edit: I mean, I said in my first response to that (now blocked) person was"the only option bibi leaves is to fight back"
I don’t know how that was unclear.
I think it was being intentionally obtuse rather than a misunderstanding.
I don’t think they are being tongue-in-cheek at all. From all I can see, they’re saying that there will be no negotiations, period, so Hamas needs to fight until everyone is dead.
Because, again, that is the only option I can see if there isn’t even a point in trying to negotiate. They are fighting a vastly superior force in a tiny space around a lot of innocent people.