The author doesn’t have the character limit or the audience the attention span to consider propaganda. But, we do.
Scaled acceptance of factual and logical inconsistency isn’t a bug. It’s a feature.
The will of the people, given to them by the leaders they believe in, is short term psychological comfort. The people are already violently rejecting facts and reason, attacking those who voice them, ensuring their safety on whichever of the false dichotomy bandwagons. By marketing factual and logical inconsistency as the basis for the only physically non-violent choice, leaders and puppeteers reinforce and widen the scope of will they may provide the people.
I’m pulling from Bernays, The Engineering of Consent. Orwell’s 1984 is a sorta’ intro to the textbook.
The author doesn’t have the character limit or the audience the attention span to consider propaganda. But, we do.
Scaled acceptance of factual and logical inconsistency isn’t a bug. It’s a feature.
The will of the people, given to them by the leaders they believe in, is short term psychological comfort. The people are already violently rejecting facts and reason, attacking those who voice them, ensuring their safety on whichever of the false dichotomy bandwagons. By marketing factual and logical inconsistency as the basis for the only physically non-violent choice, leaders and puppeteers reinforce and widen the scope of will they may provide the people.
I’m pulling from Bernays, The Engineering of Consent. Orwell’s 1984 is a sorta’ intro to the textbook.