@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • edit-23 months ago"but they sting/bite/are toxic/are icky" blah blah. nature does not owe you safetyslrpnk.netimagemessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1739arrow-down171
arrow-up1668arrow-down1image"but they sting/bite/are toxic/are icky" blah blah. nature does not owe you safetyslrpnk.net@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • edit-23 months agomessage-square149fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoYou lost me at the end. Now you’re the one being obtuse and provocative. Just because something stings or bites doesn’t mean it isn’t good for the environment.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•3 months agoJust because something is good for the environment doesn’t mean the environment can’t live without it
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoThe world would survive an extinction event given enough time, that doesn’t mean the loss of biodiversity is acceptable.
You lost me at the end. Now you’re the one being obtuse and provocative. Just because something stings or bites doesn’t mean it isn’t good for the environment.
Just because something is good for the environment doesn’t mean the environment can’t live without it
The world would survive an extinction event given enough time, that doesn’t mean the loss of biodiversity is acceptable.
Fuck you too, then
Why?