MADISON, Wis. – Four independent presidential candidates have filed signatures and paperwork to appear on the November ballot, the Wisconsin Elections Commission announced Tuesday.

  • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
    link
    -8
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I have made myself clear. Please stick to information that is in the news article posted.

    This Lemmy community explores and respects diverse viewpoints.

    And thank you for respecting the right for me to vote for who I want to vote for, even if it’s not your candidate. Let’s keep this sub civil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      I appreciate your perspective, but I’m trying to understand how your response relates to the specific topic I raised. It seems like you sidestepped the issue I mentioned regarding third-party candidates and their potential impact on elections.

      I also want to clarify that I’m not being uncivil; I’m simply expressing my concerns about the broader implications of voting choices. It’s important to consider how those choices might affect the country as a whole.

      Are you suggesting that the viewpoint about the intentional confusion created by some candidates isn’t worthy of respect? I’m a bit confused, and I’d appreciate your help in clearing this up.

      • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
        link
        -73 months ago

        I appreciate your perspective, but I’m trying to understand how your response relates to the specific topic I raised.

        And I appreciate your perspective. But I’ve made my point clear in many posts, and from now on I will only discuss information that is in the actual news article that I posted.

        I’m simply expressing my concerns about the broader implications of voting choices.

        And I respect your right to think that. I, however, disagree. I like the fact that there are more voting choices.

        The notion that a vote for a third party “dilutes” the vote is rooted in a fear-driven mentality rather than in democratic principles.

        It assumes that votes are owned by the two major parties, which they are not. Our electoral system is supposed to represent the diverse views of the electorate, not just those of the dominant parties.

        Voting for the candidate who best represents my beliefs is not just a right—it’s a responsibility.

        Democracy thrives on diversity of thought.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          It’s crucial to acknowledge that there have been documented cases where candidates have entered races specifically to confuse voters or draw votes away from a particular party. Ignoring these tactics is just as dangerous to democracy as discounting the role of third parties.

          While I understand your commitment to voting for the candidate that aligns with your beliefs, it’s essential to consider how these strategies can impact the electoral process as a whole. Recognizing these issues doesn’t undermine the value of third-party candidates; rather, it highlights the complexities and challenges within our political system.

          • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
            link
            -63 months ago

            Ignoring these tactics is just as dangerous to democracy as discounting the role of third parties.

            I believe that voting for the candidate who best represents my beliefs is not just a right—it’s a responsibility. One that I take very seriously.

            I don’t belive there is a spoiler effect, and that it relies on the strength of candidates. I understand and appreciate that you disagree, and you have every right to your opinions. As do I.