Google’s campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can’t use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it “presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions.” The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it’s completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    How would they do that? Maybe by looking at ports? You could just lie and say you only have one device.

    • youmaynotknow
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      The moment they see their ONT is registering only 1 device (the router) it’s clear everything is being routed via that.

      I have never not had a router natted behind my modem. They can see the amount of packets and data I use over the ISP, but that’s about it. On top of that my LANs and VLANs are all VPNd through NordVPN before anything hits the WAN and all DNS traffic goes though my Adguard Home and Quad9 as well, so there’s that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          They might be able to see if the data indicates the network has been though NAT (network address translation) twice, but that would look just like someone who has plugged their own wifi box into the modem

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            But how would they prove that? I have high doubt. Also what benefit would it give them? It seems like a lot of work and uncertainty for little reward.

            • youmaynotknow
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              I can’t answer that. I guess you would need to be in their place to understand that backwards way of thinking.

        • youmaynotknow
          link
          fedilink
          34 months ago

          I trust any company that’s not in my country more than any local company. Or I should say, I distrust local companies more.

    • @ArbiterXero
      link
      14 months ago

      Probably just MAC address lookups, but also possibly something weird like “ttl “ stats

        • @ArbiterXero
          link
          14 months ago

          And if you “device type” that…. You’ll see a router likely.

        • @ArbiterXero
          link
          04 months ago

          Yes.

          And they would ask “why is there a router on your network”

          • @suction
            link
            -34 months ago

            At least try to understand what is being said to you, ok son?

            • @ArbiterXero
              link
              34 months ago

              I’m very sorry that your life feels so out of control that you need to lash out so quickly with condescension.

              Did you want to talk? Or perhaps explain where you think I misunderstand?

              • @suction
                link
                -14 months ago

                Try to understand the comment you replied to, lazy ass.