• @AA5B
    link
    173 months ago

    In any just world, there’s no such argument that the victims waived his rights because

    1. You can’t waive rights
    2. A unilaterally imposed term with no option should not.be construed as “agreement”
    • @Maggoty
      link
      11
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah I think there’s a lot of people who aren’t getting this. It wasn’t an informed consent to danger form where the activity they knew was dangerous, and signed off on, killed them. This was a Terms of Service agreement you automatically agree to when you make a purchase. It’s supposed to govern the terms of using that purchase.