• @RookiMA
    link
    English
    -72 years ago

    But it is still 1 centralized server that has the code and serves it to you. Its like to say “The internet is federated as i have copied some memes onto my pc”

    • @madsen
      link
      English
      25
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No, that’s not quite how git works. Everyone who’s cloned the repo has a complete copy of the code — at least at the time they cloned/checked it out. If GitHub, Gitlab, BitBucket or whatever goes away, you can keep working without it, provided that people know how to use a remote from another machine. Git really is decentralized even if people tend to use it in a centralized fashion.

      Edit: Spelling.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        I agree with both of you (not sure why the one got so many downvotes).

        Git is not centralized. GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea, is a centralized server.

        These services are more than just git repositories. They’re issue tracking, merge/pull requests, wikis, CI/CD, etc. If the service is lost, the source is still out there but it could be quite the pain to get going again.

        • @madsen
          link
          English
          22 years ago

          You’d still have a complete copy of the current HEAD, you’d just be missing a bunch of history depending on the depth at which you cloned.

      • @RookiMA
        link
        English
        12 years ago

        It is supporting my point btw. The internet is federated then. For example: “With my copy of a meme is a complete copy too. If Lemmy goes away it keeps working without it. And i can share it al along :)” If git(hub) is federated then is everything on the internet too.

        • @madsen
          link
          English
          12 years ago

          It’s really not. In your example, the meme would be decentralized — not “the internet”. Also, I think you’re confusing “git” with services offering “git and more” such as GitHub, GitLab, etc.

          • @RookiMA
            link
            English
            12 years ago

            Yup. Thats my point. GIT IS DECENTRALIZED NOT FEDERATED.

            :D You said it yourself

            • @madsen
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Literally no one but you has used the word “federated” in his thread of comments… You responded to the original comment about git being decentralized by saying “it’s still 1 centralized server that has the code”. I corrected you, because that’s not how git works, and now I’m not sure what the fuck you’re on about…

              Edit: Screenshot, in case you forget.

              • @RookiMA
                link
                English
                12 years ago

                Sry i was wrong XD lmao. I thought you wanted to proof that git is federated