• @madsen
    link
    English
    25
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, that’s not quite how git works. Everyone who’s cloned the repo has a complete copy of the code — at least at the time they cloned/checked it out. If GitHub, Gitlab, BitBucket or whatever goes away, you can keep working without it, provided that people know how to use a remote from another machine. Git really is decentralized even if people tend to use it in a centralized fashion.

    Edit: Spelling.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I agree with both of you (not sure why the one got so many downvotes).

      Git is not centralized. GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gitea, is a centralized server.

      These services are more than just git repositories. They’re issue tracking, merge/pull requests, wikis, CI/CD, etc. If the service is lost, the source is still out there but it could be quite the pain to get going again.

      • @madsen
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        You’d still have a complete copy of the current HEAD, you’d just be missing a bunch of history depending on the depth at which you cloned.

    • @RookiMA
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      It is supporting my point btw. The internet is federated then. For example: “With my copy of a meme is a complete copy too. If Lemmy goes away it keeps working without it. And i can share it al along :)” If git(hub) is federated then is everything on the internet too.

      • @madsen
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        It’s really not. In your example, the meme would be decentralized — not “the internet”. Also, I think you’re confusing “git” with services offering “git and more” such as GitHub, GitLab, etc.

        • @RookiMA
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Yup. Thats my point. GIT IS DECENTRALIZED NOT FEDERATED.

          :D You said it yourself

          • @madsen
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Literally no one but you has used the word “federated” in his thread of comments… You responded to the original comment about git being decentralized by saying “it’s still 1 centralized server that has the code”. I corrected you, because that’s not how git works, and now I’m not sure what the fuck you’re on about…

            Edit: Screenshot, in case you forget.

            • @RookiMA
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Sry i was wrong XD lmao. I thought you wanted to proof that git is federated