• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 month ago

    Teaching someone how to read a clock for the sole purpose of using it as a math example seems like a poor use of effort.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      31 month ago

      I wouldn’t say that’s the sole purpose, just an additional purpose to being able to tell time. It’s also useful if the kid wants to be a pilot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        So what are the purposes? Nobody uses analog clocks anymore so afaict:

        1. To teach fractions
        2. Something to do with being a pilot???

        What am I missing? 😛

        • @Bytemeister
          link
          Ελληνικά
          11 month ago

          Clockwise, counter clockwise. Classic time shorthand (IE, half past ten, quarter to eleven). Time estimations (easy to see a half minute on a analog clock, digital just goes from 2:00 to 2:01)

          I think analog clock displays are more elegant, and are overall nicer than digital. Personal preference though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            I’m not saying nobody should learn it, I’m saying it’s not a great use of school resources. If you appreciate the aesthetic or functionality, then by all means go out and learn it. I personally like them, but I think that it should remain out of the curriculum for purely practical reasons.

            I still don’t really see any useful skills that learning an analog clock teaches you, besides how to read an analog clock, which isn’t useful because analog clocks are so rare IRL.
            The handful of useful skills they assist teaching isn’t worth it because there are better ways to teach those things. The clock isn’t so good at teaching all those things that it’s worth using the clock instead.