• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    I can’t comment on this, since I don’t use the bridge for a while. But it’s just an IMAP/SMTP server, so not sure why certain features wouldn’t work. What service did you end up using which has gpg integration?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      I used protonmail for 3 years - bridge issues have been being ignored by protonmail support in my opinion. “Clean cache and try again”. I stopped using protonmail and switched to mailbox.org. So far so good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        From what I read though, the GPG security model for mailbox.org is the same as it is for Proton webmail (except for the browser plugin, where the difference is not really there). I like mailbox.org, to be clear, but I don’t get how it is an alternative to the bridge.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t use mailbox gpg sevice simple as that. I use mailbox perfect imap (k-9) / pop3 (desktop) integration and use gpg natively in case if that person uses gpg. Thunderbird (desktop), k-9 with openkeychain on android. I don’t say proton is bad. It’s quite good if you never want to export mails outside our webmail. I do want it so protonmail is not for me. Most my protonmail issues were with their bridge they, until the moment I migrated to mailbox, have not resolved.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Oh that makes sense. Yeah, definitely simple encryption and exported (unencrypted) emails are not going to work together.

            I am all in support for European tech companies, so I think that mailbox.org, tuta, proton etc. Are all good options.