• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Russia had democracy for less than 5 years before there was a constitutional crisis where Yeltsin got impeached, defied the constitutional court, staged a coup and consolidated power away from parliament and towards the presidency. By 1996 all the TV channels in the country were under control of his political allies. Later on, Putin was hand picked by him specifically for his personal loyalty over any other quality. But putin didn’t even have to work that hard to consolidate power- all the tools of authoritarianism fell into his lap.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Russian_constitutional_crisis

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      But putin didn’t even have to work that hard to consolidate power- all the tools of authoritarianism fell into his lap.

      Are we still pretending Putin wasn’t behind to the FSB blowing up apartment buildings in Moscow in a false flag operation to justify a brutal war in Chechnya? That’s how he consolidated his authoritarian power, seems like a bit of work to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I would say no. It isn’t as much “work” as sending in the tanks from the regular army to shell a competing but legitimate branch of government, and having a SWAT team machine gun hundreds of protesters.