Yep! Instead of following the person around, and pointing out unimportant facts, and being mad just because someone is not voting the way they do.
it would be nice if it had a non-public karma floor after which the account would be automatically banned for manual review or at least an icon showing that the account doesn’t contribute in a positive manner.
Plenty of people who make comments to me daily who would receive that icon.
And they comment just because they’re mad that I’m not voting for their presidential candidate. Isn’t that weird, that someone would be so upset by that that they’d comment to me almost daily?! And follow me around on Lemmy?
And all because I’m not voting for their presidential candidate or being baited into getting mad when they try to shitpost. But hey, people are strange, man…
being mad just because someone is not voting the way they do.
And they comment just because they’re mad that I’m not voting for their presidential candidate
all because I’m not voting for their presidential candidate
Have I ever been mad at you for who you are choosing to vote for, are you trying to derail the conversation and look like a victim right now?
If you would like to share a comment where I’ve gotten mad at you for wanting to vote for Cornel West or whoever you’d like show us all the receipts please or stop uncivilly accusing me of untrue things.
Plenty of people who make comments to me daily who would receive that icon.
Does that mean you’re agreeing that it would be a good thing?
So wait, are you doing those things I outlined? I mean, are you following me around on Lemmy? All because you’re mad I can’t be baited and that I won’t vote a certain way? I mean are you saying you are doing that or that you are not doing that? I’m confused.
It’s a small platform, when you post and comment over a thousand times in ten days you’re going to see some familiar faces.
All because you’re mad I can’t be baited and that I won’t vote a certain way? I mean are you saying you are doing that or that you are not doing that? I’m confused.
You’re accusing me of this like you did in the PMs I shared but you are unable to share proof because it doesn’t exist.
So are you saying that you are following me around? Or that you’re not? I’m confused.
But I guess it doesn’t really matter because this conversation isn’t about the article I’ve submitted. So please keep comments focused to this article in this thread and stay civil. Thank you.
It’s a small platform, when you post and comment over a thousand times in ten days you’re going to see some familiar faces.
Which part of this do you need clarification on?
I think it’s pretty clear what I’m saying.
But I guess it doesn’t really matter because this conversation isn’t about the article I’ve submitted. So please keep comments focused to this article in this thread and stay civil. Thank you.
I think the mods do a great job here keeping the sub how they want it and don’t need you being the tone police.
I think the mods do a great job here keeping the sub how they want it
I agree. But I can choose not to respond to you anymore in this thread if you don’t have anything I feel like talking about since it doesn’t apply to the article I have posted.
So I won’t be replying to any more of your comments if I don’t feel they are related to the article I have posted.
Yep! Instead of following the person around, and pointing out unimportant facts, and being mad just because someone is not voting the way they do.
Plenty of people who make comments to me daily who would receive that icon.
And they comment just because they’re mad that I’m not voting for their presidential candidate. Isn’t that weird, that someone would be so upset by that that they’d comment to me almost daily?! And follow me around on Lemmy?
And all because I’m not voting for their presidential candidate or being baited into getting mad when they try to shitpost. But hey, people are strange, man…
Have I ever been mad at you for who you are choosing to vote for, are you trying to derail the conversation and look like a victim right now?
If you would like to share a comment where I’ve gotten mad at you for wanting to vote for Cornel West or whoever you’d like show us all the receipts please or stop uncivilly accusing me of untrue things.
Does that mean you’re agreeing that it would be a good thing?
Oh gosh, what made you think I was talking about you specifically?
Is there a particular reason you assumed I was talking about you? I mean, have you done any of those things that I outlined?!
You constantly accuse me of such but you never bring the proof.
I think you don’t like being challenged to explain yourself.
So wait, are you doing those things I outlined? I mean, are you following me around on Lemmy? All because you’re mad I can’t be baited and that I won’t vote a certain way? I mean are you saying you are doing that or that you are not doing that? I’m confused.
It’s a small platform, when you post and comment over a thousand times in ten days you’re going to see some familiar faces.
You’re accusing me of this like you did in the PMs I shared but you are unable to share proof because it doesn’t exist.
So are you saying that you are following me around? Or that you’re not? I’m confused.
But I guess it doesn’t really matter because this conversation isn’t about the article I’ve submitted. So please keep comments focused to this article in this thread and stay civil. Thank you.
Which part of this do you need clarification on?
I think it’s pretty clear what I’m saying.
I think the mods do a great job here keeping the sub how they want it and don’t need you being the tone police.
I agree. But I can choose not to respond to you anymore in this thread if you don’t have anything I feel like talking about since it doesn’t apply to the article I have posted.
So I won’t be replying to any more of your comments if I don’t feel they are related to the article I have posted.
As is my choice. Thank you!