Last week, I tried to register for a service and was really surprised by a password limit of 16 characters. Why on earth yould you impose such strict limits? Never heard of correct horse battery staple?

  • @Valmond
    link
    51 month ago

    Why not? You’re hashing it anyways, right?

    Right?!

    • @phcorcoran
      link
      121 month ago

      Sure but if my password is the entire lord of the rings trilogy as a string, hashing that would consume some resources

      • @Valmond
        link
        21 month ago

        I think there are other problems before that 😂

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      530 days ago

      Of course, but if you’re paying for network and processing costs you might as well cap it at something secure and reasonable. No sense in leaving that unbounded when there’s no benefit over a lengthy cap and there are potentially drawbacks from someone seeing if they can use the entirety of Wikipedia as their password.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        130 days ago

        You can also hash it on the client-side, then the server-side network and processing costs are fixed because every password will be transmitted using same number of bytes

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          229 days ago

          You still need to deal with that on the server. The client you build and provide could just truncate the input, but end users can pick their clients so the problem still remains.

        • @Valmond
          link
          130 days ago

          That would take care of it, you do nead to salt & hash it again server side ofc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      230 days ago

      Bcrypt and scrypt functionally truncate it to 72 chars.

      There’s bandwidth and ram reasons to put some kind of upper limit. 1024 is already kinda silly.