Question I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on possibly making votes public. This has been discussed in a lot of other issues, but here's a dedicated one for discussion. Positives Could help figh...
Probably better to post in the github issue rather than replying here.
Vibes, generally. If you see a server regularly having lots of downvotes or upvotes on things that otherwise would go the other way, it’s probably a bad sign and asking the other instance admin what’s going on should be a way to start figuring out how to handle it.
As for activitypub, there isn’t a generic server to server message that could contain a VoteTotals field while updates to the standard are proposed for addition?
I don’t think vibes is good enough. There’s not enough certainty there. You could ask the other instance admin, but who’s to say that admin is cooperative? They could be actively malicious and hiding behind this mechanism. You would ask them what’s going on and they’d just say “nothing bad to see here” and you would have no way to disprove that.
As for activitypub, there isn’t a generic server to server message that could contain a VoteTotals field while updates to the standard are proposed for addition?
There is no such thing at the moment, though Lemmy could in theory implement it among its own instances, though even that would be hard. But it would be very non-standard and wouldn’t work with other ActivityPub implementations.
Vibes, generally. If you see a server regularly having lots of downvotes or upvotes on things that otherwise would go the other way, it’s probably a bad sign and asking the other instance admin what’s going on should be a way to start figuring out how to handle it. As for activitypub, there isn’t a generic server to server message that could contain a VoteTotals field while updates to the standard are proposed for addition?
I don’t think vibes is good enough. There’s not enough certainty there. You could ask the other instance admin, but who’s to say that admin is cooperative? They could be actively malicious and hiding behind this mechanism. You would ask them what’s going on and they’d just say “nothing bad to see here” and you would have no way to disprove that.
There is no such thing at the moment, though Lemmy could in theory implement it among its own instances, though even that would be hard. But it would be very non-standard and wouldn’t work with other ActivityPub implementations.
Ah okay, my bad. Sorry about this.
That’s okay, these are very technical things. No need to be sorry :)