• @AshMan85
    link
    English
    125 days ago

    Yes I know, I said “should”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      025 days ago

      That would require a major change in the underlying protocol, and it could enable easy vote manipulation since there is no way for admins to watch out for malicious voting patterns.

      • @AshMan85
        link
        English
        025 days ago

        they are already talking about major changes. welcome to the conversasion

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          024 days ago

          This is not the conversation about the underlying protocol, which is ActivityPub. This discussion is merely within Lemmy. Lemmy does not have its own protocol, it uses the ActivityPub protocol. ActivityPub has no support currently for private votes. Lemmy’s GitHub repository is not the place to suggest ActivityPub changes.

          • @AshMan85
            link
            English
            024 days ago

            Your arguing about the logistics of the changes, everyone else is here to discuss the change it self.