Currently, almost anyone in the Fediverse can see Lemmys votes. Lemmy admins can see votes, as well as mods. Only regular Lemmy users can’t. Should the Lemmy devs create a way to make the votes anonymous?

There is a discussion going on right now considering “making the Lemmy votes public” but I think that premisse is just wrong. The votes are public already, they’re just hidden from Lemmy users. Anyone from a kbin/mbin/fedia instance can check out the votes if they are so inclined.

The users right now may fall into a false sense of privacy when voting because the votes are hidden from Lemmy users. If you want to vote something and not show up on the vote list, please create another account to support that type of content and don’t tell anyone.

      • @A_A
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        No I was not sarcastic. So now i am trying to read your paper and i think that it is above my knowledge level.

        As a layman i had the intuition that instead of having two accounts as i proposed for voting and commenting which was implemented by @rimu, we might have had something like blockchain or filecoin or some coin that would represent voting power and that would be based on our commenting value… so that coin would have been an intermediary to make voting anonymous.

        Finally i know enough about science that i know that i don’t know much.

        Edit : after a rapid overview of the article i would say that this method :
        “Blind Signature-Based e-Voting”
        would be most appropriate to our social media voting and i noticed the work they have done is more targeting national elections where the outcome is much more important.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -23 months ago

      This isn’t going to solve anything. Cryptographically secure voting helps when you can ensure that each person only gets to vote once. But anyone can just sign up for more accounts or make loads of bot accounts and vote multiple times. This solves nothing.