• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    384 months ago

    Kia and Volkswagen are massively eating away at the Tesla share, because under Musk’s leadership, Tesla doesn’t have a Unique Selling Point any more. Other networks are catching up in terms of charging speed and even then Tesla sell access. Their other USP was FSD and Musk isn’t investing enough in it. All this while his products are taking a hit due to his public image. What’s crazy though, if he delivered the new Roadster or the Truck, he would’ve increased market-share.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      The truck was never going to increase market share, it’s too divisive, dangerous, and poorly built. Plus slow and expensive to build (even to the low quality standards Tesla is becoming infamous for).

      The sports cars is for who exactly? Those don’t increase market share, it’s just a prestige car. Also a big part of the sports car market wants sound, and doesn’t drive them daily either. When it’s a weekend toy, so being electrified has a smaller positive impact, and likely will never even out the material production pollution vs usage pollution.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        64 months ago

        What if the truck was “normal”? I mean, for now, they’re still selling a lot of the low poly ones, but something sized like a Ranger/Colorado or Maverick and styled more like the R1T seems like a way smarter move for them.

        Imagine an alternate history where he never bought Twitter or started a SuperPAC and Tesla made a normal truck, the new Roadster, and was close to releasing the Model 2.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          04 months ago

          And that’s the thing nilloc is missing. It was never about how many trucks and Roadsters were delivered, it was about mindshare and cool factor.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            54 months ago

            Roadsters/sports cars are always about brand prestige, but that doesn’t necessarily help the bottom line, most often it the pet project of an auto exec. VW lost money on every Veyron it sold.

            The cyber truck is an even dumber pet project, and really shouldn’t be legal as US such a danger to bystanders. It’s stubborn design is also much more expensive to produce, especially to achieve an acceptable fit and finish.

            I was replying to a comment that was prescribing a post to financial success for Tesla.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 months ago

                Have you seen the guy who was inspecting his new truck and sliced his wrist open in the exposed edge by the tail light?

                Also the leading edge of the truck is absolutely a pedestrian murdering device.

                Most modern trucks are also terrible and need to have pedestrian safety rules applied to them, but at least they aren’t made with “bullet proof” sheets of stainless steel with literally knife sharp leading and trailing edges.

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Sorry, we were having a language problem. You’re using American truck and I’m using British truck, so we’re talking about two totally different things.

                  Your truck is the pickup, mine is the long-haul thing. 😂

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    24 months ago

                    Aahhh, that makes sense.

                    There are still some major problems with the Semi trucks too though, but purely thermodynamically.

                    Probably going to take overhead charging on shorter routes to work. The Mid-west US is going to take swappable batteries or a huge leap in charging and capacity.