Meet Claudia De la Cruz, the third-party candidate shaking up the 2024 presidential race and inspiring young voters to demand real change — from reproductive rights to ending the Gaza conflict.
What opinion do you disagree with? My comment is primarily a summary of the facts around this organization. If you dispute those facts then let’s discuss. But those are not opinions, they are either right or wrong.
Claudia de la Cruz is a member of PSL. So it’s very obviously related to her. Not sure who else you are referring to here. Stein? I haven’t seen indications she holds such views, I’m talking specifically about PSL and their members.
I can’t find direct statements from her about these topics, but consider that the PSL is a so-called democratic-centralist organization, meaning they require public unanimity in pursuing their agenda. There’s no reason to think she disagrees with these violent and oppressive views. It’s very unlikely she’d be a member if she did.
These are all about the party. I’ve seen no specific statements from de la Cruz herself. But barring any statements, it seems safe to assume she stands with the party on these issues, given its tight organization and noted ideological control of its members.
I don’t agree with your opinion at all. Tho I support your right to that opinion, that has not been my experience at all.
What opinion do you disagree with? My comment is primarily a summary of the facts around this organization. If you dispute those facts then let’s discuss. But those are not opinions, they are either right or wrong.
I don’t agree that those are facts that have anything to do with these 2 people.
Claudia de la Cruz is a member of PSL. So it’s very obviously related to her. Not sure who else you are referring to here. Stein? I haven’t seen indications she holds such views, I’m talking specifically about PSL and their members.
I can’t find direct statements from her about these topics, but consider that the PSL is a so-called democratic-centralist organization, meaning they require public unanimity in pursuing their agenda. There’s no reason to think she disagrees with these violent and oppressive views. It’s very unlikely she’d be a member if she did.
And I don’t think she is guilty of any of those things or guilty of supporting them. Do you have proof?
https://socialistworker.org/2012/01/12/socialism-in-one-dynasty
https://socialism.com/fs-article/a-political-critique-of-the-party-for-socialism-and-liberation/
https://commiewife.medium.com/a-brief-criticism-of-the-party-for-socialism-and-liberation-95923b8cae6
These are all about the party. I’ve seen no specific statements from de la Cruz herself. But barring any statements, it seems safe to assume she stands with the party on these issues, given its tight organization and noted ideological control of its members.
None of that convinces me. But I respect your right to your opinion. I just differs from mine.