• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    C and e don’t sound like bad things

    At least not bad enough for the company not to do it

    • @michaelmrose
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      All of it is a reason for people to vote not to allow it. This can be accomplished federally or via initiatives in states. If a handful states comprising 30-50% of the pop wont allow it then it will be dead.

        • @michaelmrose
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          More successful or more beneficial?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Forcing the company to be liable for the data they collect would be more likely to stop them from doing it than trying to outlaw them collecting it

            • @michaelmrose
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              No it wouldn’t because poor people can trivially be kept out of court all kinds of ways from binding arbitration to half assed enforcement. As a rule if you want someone to NOT do something you have to tell them they can’t do it!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                No it wouldn’t because elected officials don’t represent poor people

                But we’re talking about buying new BMWs anyway. Your logic was just too stupid to not laugh at

                • @michaelmrose
                  link
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  The problem is there is no reason to suspect that a lucrative strategy doesn’t spread to other manufacturers and indeed segments.