Yes, making shit up about someone and starting a hate campaign because you don’t like a certain group of people is certainly “an absolutely normal point of view”. /s
Yes, it’s what your ideological buddies do all the time. So pick one, either it’s normal or maybe you shouldn’t. In the latter case please invent a mechanism which would stop you when you yourself don’t see that. If you can’t, then I’ve won.
Read Marcus Aurelius, he was, well, a Roman emperor since being 17 and has by necessity found ways to keep his own arrogance and emotion in check (at least by the time of writing those notes he’s known for ; earlier in life he had, for example, arranged a bath for his wife filled with blood of her lover).
In my opinion you are the one embarrassing yourself, and IRL I’ve never seen people arguing this way to deliver in actual things and not arguments. However, it’s not that I myself really deliver too often, or cases where I do wouldn’t make me feel euphoric.
And I’ve been wrong to be angry. It happens naturally, and I don’t feel guilt, but it’s wrong, so I ask your apology for this.
“Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. They won’t understand the rules and will just knock over the pieces, shit on the board, then strut around like they’ve won.”
This is… The comments section of a tweet explaining more details from where someone is being prosecuted for literally that.
No, they are about someone being prosecuted for expressing an absolutely normal point of view.
Yes, making shit up about someone and starting a hate campaign because you don’t like a certain group of people is certainly “an absolutely normal point of view”. /s
Yes, it’s what your ideological buddies do all the time. So pick one, either it’s normal or maybe you shouldn’t. In the latter case please invent a mechanism which would stop you when you yourself don’t see that. If you can’t, then I’ve won.
Whatever bub.
you’re gonna leave us hanging without giving an example of their ideological buddies doing what jowling kowling rowling did to imane khelif?
It’s useless to give examples to people as intelligent as a piece of wood.
just take the L you’re embarrassing yourself
Read Marcus Aurelius, he was, well, a Roman emperor since being 17 and has by necessity found ways to keep his own arrogance and emotion in check (at least by the time of writing those notes he’s known for ; earlier in life he had, for example, arranged a bath for his wife filled with blood of her lover).
In my opinion you are the one embarrassing yourself, and IRL I’ve never seen people arguing this way to deliver in actual things and not arguments. However, it’s not that I myself really deliver too often, or cases where I do wouldn’t make me feel euphoric.
And I’ve been wrong to be angry. It happens naturally, and I don’t feel guilt, but it’s wrong, so I ask your apology for this.
Crawl into your ass
i know you think you’re trolling but this is just sad.
“Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. They won’t understand the rules and will just knock over the pieces, shit on the board, then strut around like they’ve won.”
Me knowing that phrase is the reason why I don’t get upset arguing with Americans.