• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    303 months ago

    Wouldn’t Signal or SimpleX be a better alternative to Matrix?

    Given the state of Matrix clients and Matrix is designed to be federated (plus self-hosting is not simple and requires it’s own security precautions).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If you’re running a multimillion dollar drug operation and you’re too incompetent to set up, or too cheap to pay someone to do in your place what most home-labbers could with a couple hundred bucks of hardware, then you’re going to get caught and you probably deserve it.

      Realistically xmpp over i2p or tor on a disposable live-booting OS would be the best answer. Shit even a one-time-use pay-as-you-go gas station burner woulda been better in most cases. Failing that, you should at least plant yourself in a corrupt enough country and just pay off the local law-enforcement.

      If you can’t do opsec and own your own comms, then why the fuck would you break international law like that?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        SimpleX as a very user friendly interface, uses decentralized server, does not requires your phone number or email and the server is really easy to set up (but not needed, for the regular user it just looks like any other messaging app)

        Edit: I forgot to say that their app AND servers are open source.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  43 months ago

                  I think a fork happening in a few years would be great, right now the app still need a bit of polishing but they are quickly improving it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Yes, having a purely non-profit foundation from the start would have been better.

                But, for me, it is still a better option than Signal or Matrix for messaging.

                Signal is great but they need 10s of millions every year of donations. It means that they rely on the generosity of wealthy individuals to keep going. I’m worried it is not sustainable.

                Matrix is better on this aspect since everything is open source, but the UC is not great on my opinion and I don’t fell comfortable switching to it for regular contract with family and friends. To be fair it’s been a while I haven’t used it so I downloaded Element but I am blocked on the account creation (the verification email is not arriving).

                To compare I tried creating a new account with SimpleX and in less than a minute I was ready to chat. They rely on investors for now and don’t have a clear business model which is worrying but they are developping fast this way and being fully open source anyone could fork it at any time. The UX is great despite being heavily focused on privacy and security and have features that no other app have, you don’t need an email or phone to chat and if they ever start to enshitify someone can fork it.

                Do pragmatically I think it is the best alternative right now and I am curious to see how they evolve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        Simpler to manage and smaller attack surface.

        Running your own Matrix server also means running your own host server, database, caches, reverse proxy, firewall, networking stack, etc… Keeping these things running and updated. As well as vetting and updating clients.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  33 months ago

                  Correct… So put EVERYONE into one basket… Or split everyone up into multiple baskets…

                  Now I dunno about your mom… But mine told me to not put all my eggs into one basket.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 months ago

                    How the fuck would you confirm that? Maybe the sysadmin is running a forked version of matrix that just says it’s encrypted but actually logs everything in clear text.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 months ago

                How is it a lot harder to track if the FBI can just subpoena the sysadmin for server/room logs?

                With respect, this viewpoint is not defensible from an operational security perspective.

                It’s like saying they should use GMail because they have hundreds of millions of users. When the problem isn’t being a needle in haystack, but rather the fact that Google will gladly look through your private data and happily hand it over to the authorities.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    What would stop them from subpoenaing all information from your personal server?

                    If you’re a drug dealer and the FBI sends you a subpoena—you could simply….not respond.

                    There’s no personal information tied to your account.

                    There is actually a bunch of metadata tied to your account and your room. That’s partly how they caught that kid with the Pentagon leaks.

                    And again, there may be other services between the clients and the matrix server that collect personal data (e.g. reverse proxies, load balancers).

                    If you are someone who ostensibly cares about privacy and security (like a drug dealer) why would you rely on the benevolence and security hygiene of a stranger you can’t audit? Instead of using a known good actor, like Signal or SimpleX, or no actor, like Briar.

      • @rottingleaf
        link
        English
        33 months ago

        Tox is a good idea with dubious realization (few devs, large codebase, seemingly stagnating).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          I tried to use tox cli client and it’s barely usable. Gui clients just half baked barely products. Adding to the piling bad reputation of the development team ( some fraud, adding backdoor ip leaks ) I think it’s enough to bury tox

          • @rottingleaf
            link
            English
            33 months ago

            Some time ago the project itself seemed nice (toxcore github included) and there were a few nice little clients which even worked, ratox was especially cool (a fifo client), I’ve made an attempt to switch friends\family to tox back then, and we used toxic and utox for voice calls with one my friend instead of skype.

            However, since then it seems as if the changes were not positive.

            It’s really sad, because it felt as the closest thing to come ideologically to replacing skype with a free and open source technology. I’d say something architecturally similar to tox plus activitypub-connected directory\identity (and maybe history) servers would be a success.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              I agree with you. The idea of tox was great, unfortunately implementation was not that much. Indeed imo loss for messanger apps / protos ecosystem