• @BatrickPateman
      link
      6126 days ago

      Was that the bot that just cut paragraphs from an article to shorten them, mangling context beyond comprehension in the process?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5926 days ago

        I rarely had that problem from the bot. Reading from it at least gave me more information and saved me a click without having to be bombarded with cookie notices and requests to subscribe to a newsletter.

        • @LesserAbe
          link
          1726 days ago

          I did like it when the site was pay walled

        • @ZILtoid1991
          link
          026 days ago

          Just use archive.org! At least then you’re not getting an AI hallucinated “summary” of the article.

      • @Zorque
        link
        English
        3726 days ago

        When it comes to tools that help you stay informed, I’d say the opposite is true.

        If one wants to maintain ignorance, they should have to do so at their own inconvenience.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1526 days ago

            Considering you seem to dislike the whole concept of Bots, isn’t the Bot toggle in the Lemmy profile exactly what you want?

            It auto ignores all posts and comments made by accounts marked as Bots. Sure, the owner of the account has to correctly mark it, but I feel that can easily be solved by reporting unmarked bots.

            But I’m interested, if you would like to expand on it, how would you make a bot opt-in?
            The only way I could think of is through PMs, but that would be cumbersome, and generally unfit for purpose, for all the involved parties.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                426 days ago

                You have no measurement of any bot’s popularity. You’re just making the claim without proof.

              • @saltesc
                link
                3
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                Ah, I see. We should just pass all bots through you for approval first.

                Sorry, everyone else. I know some of you liked that bot, but wazoobonkerbrain doesn’t, so it’s switched off due to “popularity reasons”. If you want to experience open internet, you’ll have to find somewhere else.

          • @Zorque
            link
            English
            1326 days ago

            Whether they are effective or not is definitely in question, but they are unquestionably intended to be informative. If they irritate you, you have the ability to exercise your right to block them.

            You being annoyed at something you don’t like isn’t a reason to not have it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  117 days ago

                  This user is literally lying about what the thread contains! holy shit the level of gaslighting and misinformation is insane! How can you function!?!?!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -226 days ago

                That thread was filled with people downvoting anyone who even attempted to disagree. It was also full of people claiming bias and then not backing it up with a single source, link to offending pages, etc. so yeah no wonder it was full of people saying they hated it. Anyone who said otherwise (like myself) got fucking reamed.

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            626 days ago

            how is it irratating. takes up almost no space. sounds to me like folks are angry they think other people will use it.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        1826 days ago

        not really. there is no good way for people to know what bots are available. if they had a bots section in the settings where you could turn them on then maybe.

      • @Donkter
        link
        326 days ago

        You can opt in to not seeing the bots.