• @samus12345
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The restaurant in question wasn’t located in the park, so that clause was just as irrelevant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      Agreed but it isn’t as much a stretch as the disney+ agreement and serves the same purpose for their argument. The restaurant is on disney owned property right next to the park.