• Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
    link
    -53 months ago

    She explained why she was there. And I have no issues with her. So no, I don’t think she’s working for or with Russia.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      I never said she was a Russian agent, I’m just reflecting on the company she keeps. She chose to stay, chose to listen. Chose to dine with them. We know that for certain. It reasonably opens the door to further concern.

      I’m sure she would explain the presence away, that’s no defence. Same as trump would have some oh so benign explanation for why he was on Epstein’s jet.

      • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
        link
        -63 months ago

        She chose to stay, chose to listen.

        She explained why she was there and what she was doing while there.

        And I’m happily voting for her.

        Not sure why you keep bringing Epstein up. He has nothing to do with Jill Stein, the news article posted, or this conversation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I never said he has anything to do with stein. I made a clear point of discussion that Epstein has relation to trump as a point of comparison.

          I.e. Jill was around Putin and Flynn, with an excuse.

          Trump was around Epstein, with an excuse.

          Super basic critical thinking.

          • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
            link
            -63 months ago

            Again with the Epstein. This has nothing to do with Epstein. Let’s move on. You disagree with me. I disagree with you. And that’s ok.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              It’s not “again” you said you didn’t understand, and I clarified I never associated Epstein with stein, then reminded you what I did associate him with (trump, and a pattern of familiarity that is suspect)

              The point you aren’t getting is the names don’t matter, it’s the pattern and proximity, albeit with an “excuse”, which proves paper thin given the reputation of the other person (Putin/ Flynn, or Epstein.)

              • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
                link
                -73 months ago

                So you don’t think any majory organizations looked into to it?! You don’t think that if there was something there, that the news orgs would cover it?! Do you have some sort of proof that they don’t have?

                Dude, it’s been looked into. It’s a non-story. I get it means a lot to you. But it doesn’t mean anything to me or my fellow Green Party voters. Move on.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  It was widely reported and discussed as concerning from a variety of platforms/orgs.

                  If you don’t see how steins soft on Russia language, and her association (once witnessed, how often outside of that dinner?) With Flynn and Putin is suspect, then theres nothing else to discuss.

                  It’s so fucking transparent how her only goals are to sow discord and she never lays her efforts on republicans.

                  Edit “never” outside of soft pitch attacks

                  • Socialist Mormon SatanistOP
                    link
                    -73 months ago

                    And she hasn’t ever been found guility of wrongdoing. Nothing illegal happened. And I’m voting for her. You’ve said nothing that has changed my mind.

                    Also, I don’t hate russia.