• Flying SquidOP
      link
      5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I see. And what about people with Swyer Syndrome? They can live their entire lives with no one, not even them, suspecting their chromosomes are XY. Men? Should we be genetically testing every woman to make sure she isn’t really a man and doesn’t know it?

      • DMBFFF
        link
        03 months ago

        Such a person can compete in womens sports FAIC.

        wp:Swyer syndrome

        A 2017 study estimated that the incidence of Swyer syndrome is approximately 1 in 100,000 females.[22] Fewer than 100 cases have been reported as of 2018. There are extremely rare instances of familial Swyer syndrome.[23][24]

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          23 months ago

          You are defining ‘woman’ by whether or not sports officials decide they can compete with other women? And then you try to use science afterward?

          • DMBFFF
            link
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I think anyone who defines wt:thonself as a woman should be able to compete in any Olympic event as a woman.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              23 months ago

              You do know that we can see your post history, right?

              But this ‘thon’ thing is very droll. I’m sure you think you’ve done a real gotcha with it.

              • DMBFFF
                link
                13 months ago

                As one who dislikes the singular they—I kinda like distinctions in regards to numbers in pronouns—I kinda like “thon.”

                • Flying SquidOP
                  link
                  23 months ago

                  Again, everyone can see your post history.

                  Not only can everyone see your post history, they can see the posts you’ve made in this thread.

                  https://lemmy.world/comment/11956439

                  So why you’re even attempting this nonsense is beyond me.

                  • DMBFFF
                    link
                    13 months ago

                    I kinda wished English 2nd-person pronouns made distinctions for plurality. We know they exist with 1st-person pronouns, but alas, the so-called progressives are ruining plurality in 3rd-person pronouns.

                    I suppose we could take it up a notch and replace all gender-specific 3rd person pronouns with the singular they.

    • @I_Has_A_Hat
      link
      43 months ago

      Seems like if you have to make exceptions for your definition to work, it’s not a very good definition.