• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53 months ago

    If I recall, Disney Springs is outside of the parks, basically an outside mall-type area with a bunch of third-party shops and restaurants. Disney is plenty evil, but they’re just the landlord in this situation.

    • @bitwaba
      link
      163 months ago

      A landlord that owns a streaming service who tries to argue that usage of that streaming service allows them to not be sued by fucking up your food order.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -13 months ago

        Their other legal argument made more sense… They have nothing to do with food preparation done by one of the tenants.

    • @TheEhHole
      link
      113 months ago

      And I can’t think of many things more evil than a landlord

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        I have less issues with landlords with commercial tenants… A lot of retailers do not want to own real estate or maintain properties. Residential landlords, on the other hand…

    • @piecat
      link
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t know any other landlords that advertise and vouch their clients on their website.

      I bet cafeterias or food courts have gotten sued for the same thing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        You don’t? The malls, outlets, and high-end shopping centers around here certainly maintain a website as well as signage for their tenants.

        If someone stopped at a Rest Stop and Baskin Robins errantly put tree nuts in their dish, I don’t of any legal precident making the Rest Stop owner liable.

        • @piecat
          link
          33 months ago

          It’s the fact they vouched for the resturaunt.

          I don’t mean having a sign or directory. I mean saying specifically “the BR at our rest stop is allergy friendly” vs “our rest stop has a basken robbins, check their page for details”