@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 3 months ago👁️ 🌹 💨 💨lemmy.mlimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down16file-text
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1image👁️ 🌹 💨 💨lemmy.ml@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square30fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish23•3 months agoFor a shift from about 700nm to 350nm: coming right at you at 0.6c It would also have a kinetic energy of about 1.1234 Petajoules, on the order of magnitude of the Tsar Bomba
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-23 months agoKinetic energy or total energy? Assuming the rose weight 10 grams I get that 1.12PJ total energy, but only 0.23PJ is kinetic.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•3 months agoIn hindsight I was a bit generous with the weight, I assumed 50g
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoOne ton of TNT is 1E9 calories which is 4 gigajoules. So 0.2 petajoules should be only 50 kilotons of TNT?
minus-squareFuck spezlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 months agoA fart in the wind next to the Tsar Bomba. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.
For a shift from about 700nm to 350nm: coming right at you at 0.6c
It would also have a kinetic energy of about 1.1234 Petajoules, on the order of magnitude of the Tsar Bomba
Kinetic energy or total energy? Assuming the rose weight 10 grams I get that 1.12PJ total energy, but only 0.23PJ is kinetic.
In hindsight I was a bit generous with the weight, I assumed 50g
chonk rose 😳
Only 10MT instead of 50 then?
One ton of TNT is 1E9 calories which is 4 gigajoules. So 0.2 petajoules should be only 50 kilotons of TNT?
A fart in the wind next to the Tsar Bomba. My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.