The Republican Party cannot blame the media's positive reaction to Vice President Kamala Harris for the downturn in their fortunes, wrote National Review executive editor Mark Antonio Wright. Rather, their problem begins with the fact that they "picked a bad candidate" to lead the ticket.The Nationa...
The chart is labeled
“Presidential Circles of Suck”
Presidents that sucked. So how did Carter suck? Losing his second term means he sucks? No.
So again, how does Carter suck?
Is this bait? Like, are you trolling? Because I didn’t make the chart. You clearly understand the chart. You just want to start a fight over the title of the chart? It’s a silly name for a funny chart. Calm down bruv.
Removed by mod
Removed, civility.
What a question to ask when you’re the one who didn’t read the clearly labeled graphic.
Are you people actually insane?
Please indicate where it explains Carter was a bad president
Ooof.
Chart is labeled. Doesn’t mean anything more than he didn’t get elected twice. Like, Carter is cool. I like Carter. But the chart is labeled brother. The joke being made is that many presidents have had failures, like Carter’s failure to get elected again. Is it really his fault? Not really, but this chart isn’t about Carter. It’s not that deep bruv.
Like, your just yelling that Carter didn’t suck where the only qualifying requirement to “suck” is one of the three circles. It’s a joke. A gaff. A goof. Why are you swinging like someone just spit on him and called him Hitler?
Literally not yelling tho lol
Really reread this entire thread. I asked how Carter sucked and got a snarky comment.
This chart is labeled presidents that sucked, I really just asked how Carter falls into that. I truly don’t understand how anything I said was taken this far.
Gotcha