dantheclamman to Not The OnionEnglish • 24 days agoKentucky State Fair removes ribbon-winning miniature after realizing it depicted a porn setnypost.commessage-square88arrow-up1581arrow-down15
arrow-up1576arrow-down1external-linkKentucky State Fair removes ribbon-winning miniature after realizing it depicted a porn setnypost.comdantheclamman to Not The OnionEnglish • 24 days agomessage-square88
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-5•24 days agoIts an actual 1:1 faithful recreation of a porn set. Cheek prints and stain included.
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish3•24 days agoI’m aware of what it is. Because I’ve seen porn. Like I said, it’s an “if you know, you know” situation. If a kid sees this and knows what it is, that kid has seen porn. Otherwise, it’s just a room.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-5•24 days agoSomebody who knew didn’t like it and now people like you are filling up my inbox making a stink about it. Whats your problem? Other people aren’t allowed to be upset about things you like? Their feelings don’t matter?
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish5•24 days agoThey’re allowed to be as upset as they like. People get upset about all sorts of silly things. That doesn’t mean they need to be catered to. And what do you mean your inbox?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•24 days agoSo you acknowledge their feelings but you wish them harm, got it.
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish5•24 days agoWhat are you even talking about? People are offended by statues of Martin Luther King, Jr. Should we take them down because those people are upset?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-3•24 days agoTolerance for all except the intolerant. Porn sets aren’t a protected class but keep ypur hopes up for the year 2412
minus-squareFlying SquidlinkEnglish3•23 days agoDude, you’re literally embodying a Simpsons episode which already came true.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-5•edit-223 days agoI want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance. I made a comment earlier about how dressing a Naiad Statue up as a hooker changes the context of the artwork significantly.
Its an actual 1:1 faithful recreation of a porn set. Cheek prints and stain included.
I’m aware of what it is. Because I’ve seen porn. Like I said, it’s an “if you know, you know” situation. If a kid sees this and knows what it is, that kid has seen porn. Otherwise, it’s just a room.
Somebody who knew didn’t like it and now people like you are filling up my inbox making a stink about it.
Whats your problem? Other people aren’t allowed to be upset about things you like? Their feelings don’t matter?
They’re allowed to be as upset as they like. People get upset about all sorts of silly things. That doesn’t mean they need to be catered to.
And what do you mean your inbox?
So you acknowledge their feelings but you wish them harm, got it.
What are you even talking about?
People are offended by statues of Martin Luther King, Jr. Should we take them down because those people are upset?
Tolerance for all except the intolerant. Porn sets aren’t a protected class but keep ypur hopes up for the year 2412
Dude, you’re literally embodying a Simpsons episode which already came true.
I want you to think deeply about if all porn is inherently artistic or if porn depictions have a separate circuimstance.
I made a comment earlier about how dressing a Naiad Statue up as a hooker changes the context of the artwork significantly.